















50Pcs Bubble Pouches Wrap Bag, 12”x16” Double Wall Shockproof Bubble Bags, Clear Bubble Out Bags for Packing, Cushioning Bags for Moving, Shipping and Packing
0 out of 5
$22.99
SKU: B0F19CZW4D
- Size Guide
- Reviews (9)

| Size | DHL Box | Internal Dimensions (cm) | Max Weight (kg) | FedEx Equivalent (approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XS | Box 2 | 33.7 × 18.2 × 10 | ~1 | Small Box (8″×8″×8″) |
| S | Box 3 | 33.7 × 32.2 × 10 | ~2 | Medium Box (12″×12″×10″) |
| M | Box 4 | 33.7 × 32.2 × 18 | ~5 | Large Box (13″×13″×11″) |
| L | Box 5 | 33.7 × 33.2 × 34.5 | ~10 | FedEx 10kg Box (40.16 × 32.86 × 25.88) |
| XL | Box 6 | 41.7 × 35.9 × 36.9 | ~15 | FedEx Large (16″×16″×16″) |
| XXL | Box 7 / 8 | 48.1 × 40.4 × 38.9 or 54.1 × 44.4 × 40.9 | ~20–25 | FedEx Extra Large (42 × 42 × 47) |
9 reviews for 50Pcs Bubble Pouches Wrap Bag, 12”x16” Double Wall Shockproof Bubble Bags, Clear Bubble Out Bags for Packing, Cushioning Bags for Moving, Shipping and Packing
Add a review Cancel reply
Related Products
✅ Packaging Machines
$44.97 Original price was: $44.97.$8.04Current price is: $8.04.
12 * 12 inch Packing Paper for Moving 100 Sheets Protecting Fragile China and Glasses,Small Wrapping Paper for Shipping and Moving Box Filler
0 out of 5
✅ Packaging Machines
$75.99 Original price was: $75.99.$58.64Current price is: $58.64.
23pcs Packing Extractor Set, Portable Packing Puller Tool, Flexible Shaft Corkscrew Hook Extractor, Stainless Steel Packing Tool Set, Packing Removal Kit with Toolbox and Different Tips and Lengths
0 out of 5
✅ Packaging Machines
$8.99 Original price was: $8.99.$8.04Current price is: $8.04.
Bubble Packing Wrap for Moving Boxes Shipping Cushioning Supplies 1 Roll 12" X 15' Perforated
0 out of 5
✅ Packaging Machines
$25.00 Original price was: $25.00.$26.02Current price is: $26.02.
Palmetto 1101 Packing Extractor, Flexible Shaft, Removeable tip, Size F-1, 7-1/2 inch Length, for Packing Sizes 1/4 & up
0 out of 5
✅ Packaging Machines
$49.99 Original price was: $49.99.$40.24Current price is: $40.24.
VENO 4 Pack Wreath Storage Bag, Summer, Christmas Decoration Garland Container, 30 Inch Clear Door Wreath Organizers, Moving Boxes, Packing Supplies for College (Square - 4 Pack)
0 out of 5









secretary –
great value
Worked perfectly – kept items safe – great value – quality was very good
Tammy –
Makes packing quicker
This a good size for mugs and juice cups. My mom is sorting through her precious glassware and knick knacks. Also, a small PYREX lid fit.I originally bought them for her mid-size porcelain dolls, but we havenât gotten to that room yet.I will need to buy more. Other reviews state they are thin. It is one layer of bubbles. I believe they protect better than newspaper or towels, which is what my mom was using before.Also, itâs quick to slide the items inside the pouch. You can tape them up if you want a more secure closure. The tape is not included.
Ronny5515 –
Solutions Perfected
Again great solutions for shipping, storing, and donating fragile items.
Emily Steil –
Get alot for the price
You get alot for the price haven’t really tried them out yet and I don’t know if ill actually need them but it could come in handy for my shopping trip in medellin
Katerina –
They run small
Not exactly according to dimensions it claims⦠smaller than indicated. Should be 8â x 10â but itâs .25-.5â smaller than it says⦠These will suit my needs for now but I was hoping theyâd have more space!
Grandma –
Bubble wrap protectors
Nice size for breakables. Great protection.
Sherri Lynne –
Good Quality Bubbles For Protection of Goods
These were perfect size for what I needed. The quality is great. I would recommend
Anita Dittig –
Perfect for my needs in my RV
Great value for the price. I purchase this item to wrap my glasses that I use in my RV while traveling. They protected my glassware perfectly and they are very durable.
Jodi Hoffmeyer –
I ended up returning these as the bubbles weren’t sufficiently filled. I was hoping to use them to wrap breakables in while moving, but I would have had to double up every item and cost wise, that wasn’t efficient.